facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast phone blog search brokercheck brokercheck Play Pause
%POST_TITLE% Thumbnail

Value vs Growth Debate

At Stratus, we believe in long-term investing strategies that tilt toward risk factors with higher expected returns.  One of these risk factors is over-weighting value stocks in relation to growth stocks because paying a lower price for a stock means we should expect a higher return.  However, over the last decade growth stocks have outperformed value stocks, which has led many investors to wonder whether the value "premium" is a viable risk factor anymore.

To help answer that question, we would like to provide you with some interesting research from Dimensional Fund Advisors* (DFA).  In this short piece, Dimensional compares the July 2009 to June 2019 return of value and growth stocks with their long-term return (July 1926 through June 2019).  This comparison shows that over the past 10 years, value stock returns have been in-line with their long-term averages while growth stocks have vastly outperformed their long-term averages.  Based on this data, here's the question we pose to investors: Is it worth making a bet that growth stocks will continue to depart from their long-term historical average returns?

Remember that markets are volatile and changing your investment strategy without considering comparisons to other time periods is often a way to miss the long-term out-performance of a specific risk factor.  We believe a consistent, well thought out plan is your strongest strategy for wealth creation.

We'd be happy to talk with you If you'd like to discuss your portfolio allocation and financial planning strategy.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

* indicates required